REALITY CHECK FOR RESEVATION BASED ON ECONOMIC BASIS
Poverty line can be defined as "The level of income below which one cannot afford to purchase all the resources one requires to live" ((http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_line):
Data from various national and international organizations, about India’s poor population is readily available on the Internet. A quick search on Google puts about 30% (I found figures ranging from 27% to 35%) of Indian population below poverty line. So about 30% of Indian population doesn’t even have enough food, clothes and housing (forget about decent health care and other facilities). This 30% doesn't even include the 4th class employees and other low paid workers with regular jobs in India.
Since the protests are to stop the reservation in elite institutes, I find it entirely fair to classify as poor, all those who are at a **serious disadvantage** due to poverty, and so can't afford the following facilities which **majority (if not all)** of present students in elite institutes have afforded in their lives.
1. 12 years of study in good schools that have a library, playing areas, well qualified English speaking teachers, decent class rooms, opportunities to develop the personality, communication skills and self confidence.
2. An atmosphere at home that encourages to study, parents who are educated and help you to study, a decent room with a desk, enough money to buy books and magazines (I could have included much more like video games, computers, and other goodies but let's keep it to bare minimum)
3.Access to quality coaching institutes like the Brilliants Tutorials etc.
We don't need a survey to say that 50% (a very conservative estimate including the 30% below poverty line) of Indian population would fall into the category of poor based upon the above criteria. A small percentage of this population would probably be brilliant enough to perform great without any help, but it would be fair to say that most of them would need a level playing ground to compete with rest of the relatively well off Indians to gain admission in the elite educational institutions.
Lots of people say that instead of reservation, the government should provide educational and other facilities to give a boost to the poor. Considering the present state of governance in India, I think it would be naïve to say that government can provide (and guarantee) the above-mentioned highly expensive facilities to the kids of more than **half a billion** people in India? It is just not possible.
So one of the other alternatives is to give reservation to the poor, so that they can compete and come up. And this is exactly what I'm hearing over and over again these days "reservation should be on economic basis, reservation should be given to the poor irrespective of the caste, etc".
SO I WANT TO KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE,AMONG THOSE PROTESTING AGAINST RESERVATION IN NEW DELHI, WOULD TRULY STAND BEHIND THE GOVERNMENT IF IT DECIDES TO ABOLISH ALL CASTE BASED RESERVATION AND TO GIVE 50% RESERVATION TO THE POOR IN ALL PROFESSIONAL COLLEGES OF INDIA?
Don’t forget that a vast majority of those falling under the 50% reservation for the poor would be the same people for whom the reservation exists in the present form. Some of those poor would be from the upper castes, but expect **most** of them to still be the SC/ST/OBCs who everybody is labeling as uncultured, incompetent and worthless people.
Please give your honest opinions.
